رهپویه معماری و شهرسازی

رهپویه معماری و شهرسازی

بررسی تأثیر ویژگی‌های عنصر ایوان در رفتار حرارتی ساختمان‌های سنتی شهر تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
2 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه معماری و انرژی، مؤسسه آموزش عالی رسام، کرج، ایران
10.22034/rau.2026.2075971.1274
چکیده
طراحی فضاهای نیمهباز مانند ایوان و حیاط مرکزی در اقلیمهای گرم و خشک، از مهمترین راهکارهای غیرفعال در کنترل تابش، تهویه طبیعی و بهبود آسایش حرارتی ساختمانها محسوب میشود. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارزیابی نقش ایوان در بهینهسازی عملکرد حرارتی و کاهش مصرف انرژی در اقلیم گرم و خشک تهران انجام شد. برای این منظور، یک مدل برگرفته از اتاق مجاور ایوان در خانههای سنتی به عنوان نمونه انتخاب گردید و مدلسازی سهبعدی آن در نرمافزار دیزاینبیلدر بر پایه موتور شبیهسازی انرژیپلاس صورت گرفت. در این مطالعه، دو سناریوی «با ایوان» و «بدون ایوان» و همچنین چهار موقعیت جغرافیایی ایوان (شمالی، جنوبی، شرقی و غربی) مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. دادههای حاصل از شبیهسازی شامل دمای هوا، دمای تابشی میانگین، شاخص آسایش حرارتی PMV و شاخص نارضایتی حرارتی PPD در بازه زمانی یکساله ارزیابی شدند. نتایج نشان داد که ایوان جنوبی در فصول گرم موجب کاهش میانگین دمای داخلی تا 0.6 درجه سانتیگراد و کاهش PPD تا حدود 8 درصد نسبت به حالت بدون ایوان گردید. همچنین، وجود ایوان باعث کاهش بار سرمایشی سالیانه و بهبود کارایی تهویه طبیعی شد. در مقابل، حذف ایوان یا استقرار آن در جهات شرقی و غربی سبب افزایش دمای داخلی و مصرف انرژی گردید. همچنین باید توجه داشت که تأثیرات دمای صبحگاهی در ایوان شرقی در برخی مواقع سال باعث کاهش میزان گرمایش مورد نیاز ساختمان خواهد شد. یافتهها بیانگر آن است که طراحی بهینه ایوان میتواند ضمن افزایش پایداری حرارتی، موجب صرفهجویی در مصرف انرژی و ارتقای کیفیت محیطی در ساختمانهای مسکونی اقلیم گرم و خشک گردد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Impact of Iwan Design Features on the Thermal Behavior of Traditional Buildings in Tehran

نویسندگان English

Ahmad Reza Keshtkar Ghalati 1
Shahrzad Badrkhahan 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Graduated with a master’s degree in Architecture and Energy, Rassam Institute of Higher Education, Karaj, Iran
چکیده English

The optimization of architectural elements in response to local climatic conditions has long been a crucial factor in achieving thermal comfort and energy efficiency within buildings. In traditional Iranian architecture, passive strategies such as central courtyards and semi-open spaces like the Iwan have played an integral role in moderating microclimatic conditions, reducing dependence on mechanical systems, and ensuring thermal equilibrium throughout seasonal changes. This research investigates the thermal and energy performance of the Iwan as a passive architectural element in hot and dry climates, focusing on the Moghadam Museum House in Tehran as a representative example of historical architecture adapted to local environmental conditions. The study aims to analyze how the presence, orientation, and geometric configuration of the Iwan influence indoor thermal comfort, natural ventilation, and overall building energy consumption. For this purpose, a three-dimensional model of one of the rooms in the Moghadam Museum House was developed and simulated using DesignBuilder software, which is powered by the EnergyPlus dynamic thermal simulation engine. Two primary scenarios were tested: the baseline model without an Iwan and an alternative model with the existing northern Iwan as depicted in the historical plan of the building. Additional simulations were performed by rotating the Iwan to the southern, eastern, and western orientations to determine the optimal configuration for thermal and energy performance under Tehran’s climatic conditions. The simulations were conducted under natural ventilation without any mechanical HVAC systems to isolate the passive effects of the Iwan. All boundary walls except the façade containing the Iwan were treated as adiabatic surfaces, ensuring consistent heat transfer conditions for accurate comparison. The study focused on analyzing annual and monthly variations in air temperature, mean radiant temperature (MRT), operative temperature, relative humidity, Predicted Mean Vote (PMV), and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied (PPD), all evaluated according to ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort.
The results of the annual simulation revealed significant differences in indoor environmental conditions across various orientations of the Iwan. In the absence of an Iwan, the average indoor air temperature reached 23.50°C, with a mean radiant temperature of 24.18°C and an operative temperature of 23.84°C, whereas the inclusion of a northern Iwan reduced these values to 22.88°C, 23.49°C, and 23.19°C, respectively. The southern Iwan demonstrated slightly higher thermal gains, with an operative temperature of 25.91°C, but provided more effective solar shading during peak summer months. The eastern and western Iwans resulted in higher indoor temperatures (above 25.5°C), indicating increased exposure to low-angle solar radiation during the morning and afternoon. Relative humidity also varied across configurations, averaging 27.12% in the base case and 22.91% with a southern Iwan, reflecting the interaction between ventilation rates and indoor air dryness. The Fanger comfort indices indicated that the northern and southern Iwans provided the most balanced thermal comfort conditions. The annual average PPD values were 76.16% for the northern Iwan and 68.52% for the southern one, while the PMV indices were -0.58 and +0.17, respectively, indicating that the southern Iwan produced slightly warmer conditions but still acceptable comfort levels.
Further analysis revealed that the presence of an Iwan contributed to the mitigation of temperature fluctuations throughout the day, leading to improved thermal stability and lower cooling demand. The absence of an Iwan resulted in increased solar radiation penetration, especially during summer, causing overheating and higher PPD values exceeding 90% in July and August. The inclusion of a southern Iwan reduced the cooling load by approximately 10% compared to the base case, highlighting its shading effectiveness against high-angle solar radiation. The total annual cooling energy demand in the no-Iwan model was 36,850.09 kWh, while the Iwan model consumed 33,259.98 kWh, demonstrating a substantial reduction in energy consumption due to passive architectural adaptation. Heating demand, conversely, slightly increased in the Iwan case (211.96 kWh compared to 61.43 kWh) as a result of shading effects reducing solar heat gain during winter. Despite this, the net annual energy performance favored the Iwan-equipped configuration due to its improved summer efficiency. Moreover, airflow analysis indicated that natural ventilation rates (ACH) were highest for the open southern Iwan configuration, reaching 1.31 ACH, while the no-Iwan scenario had a lower rate of 0.87 ACH. Enhanced cross-ventilation contributed to efficient removal of internal heat and improved air quality, reducing reliance on mechanical fans and active cooling systems. Simulation outputs for PMV and PPD further confirmed these results: the southern Iwan maintained PMV within the ±0.5 comfort range during 63% of annual hours, while the northern Iwan achieved acceptable comfort during 59% of the time. These findings align closely with previous research emphasizing the critical role of semi-open architectural spaces in moderating heat exchange and enhancing occupant comfort in arid regions (Zhou et al., 2023; Heidari & Sharples, 2022).
In addition to thermal comfort, the study examined the effect of the Iwan on lighting and energy efficiency. The Iwan acted as a passive shading device, mitigating glare and distributing daylight more uniformly across interior spaces. This effect reduced direct solar penetration, preventing localized overheating near windows and reduced cooling loads. Although artificial lighting consumption was slightly higher in Iwan-equipped scenarios due to reduced direct sunlight, the overall energy savings from reduced cooling demands outweighed this increase. The total electricity use for mechanical systems, including fans and pumps, was 7,314.65 kWh in the Iwan scenario, compared to 7,790.69 kWh in the scenario without the Iwan, representing an approximately 6% reduction in auxiliary energy use.
From a seasonal perspective, the southern Iwan demonstrated superior performance in the warm months (May to September), mitigating overheating and stabilizing indoor temperatures around 26°C. The northern Iwan and the no-Iwan configurations performed similarly during cooler months (November to February), indicating that the northern shading had limited but positive effects during winter. The eastern and western Iwans, although contributing to shading, introduced higher thermal loads due to direct morning and evening sun exposure, suggesting that they are less effective in Tehran’s climatic context.
Overall, the findings confirm that the incorporation of a southern Iwan provides optimal thermal and energy performance in hot and dry climates. The results emphasize that passive architectural elements, when designed based on climatic data, can substantially enhance the environmental performance of buildings. The presence of the Iwan effectively balances solar gain, ventilation, and daylight distribution, thereby enhancing thermal comfort and minimizing reliance on mechanical systems. This corroborates traditional Persian architectural principles, in which spatial hierarchies and semi-open courtyards were historically employed to regulate microclimates naturally.
In conclusion, the simulation-based assessment demonstrates that integrating Iwans into modern residential architecture in hot and dry regions can play a significant role in achieving sustainable building performance. The study highlights the potential for combining traditional passive strategies with modern simulation tools–such as DesignBuilder–to optimize design decisions. Implementing such elements can lead to measurable reductions in cooling energy demand, enhanced thermal comfort, and improved indoor environmental quality, thereby fostering more resilient and energy-efficient buildings. The Moghadam Museum House case study exemplifies how architectural heritage can inform contemporary sustainable design practices, bridging the gap between traditional wisdom and modern technology. These results underscore the importance of climate-responsive architectural design, particularly the reintroduction of Iwans and courtyards as integral components of building envelopes in regions characterized by high solar radiation and low humidity. The study suggests that future research should expand upon these findings by incorporating occupant behavior modeling, multi-objective optimization of geometric parameters, and hybrid systems integrating photovoltaic shading devices to further enhance building performance and energy resilience in arid environments.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Iwan
Hot and dry climate
House
Thermal comfort
Energy simulation
منابع
احمدی، ف. (1384)، حیاط مرکزی در معماری ایران، نشریه صفه، (41)، وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری.
آزادیفر، ا.؛ عمرانیپور، ع.؛ مسعودینژاد، م.؛ وفامهر، م. (1400)، بازخوانی هندسه حیاط مرکزی در دستیابی به نور روز در خانههای قاجاری کاشان، معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، 9 (1)، 7795. https://doi.org/10.22061/jsaud.2021.6468.1671.
بشارت، ح.؛ کیانیان، س. (1400)، تأثیر سیستمهای سرمایش غیرفعال در خانههای حیاط مرکزی در اقلیم گرم و خشک ایران، گزارشهای انرژی، 7، 1405-1417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.093.
تقیپور، م.؛ قهرمانایزدی، ن.؛ اسکندری، ح.؛ موحد، خ. (1402)، تحلیل رفتار فرم حیاط مرکزی در تهویه طبیعی خانههای سنتی اقلیم گرم و خشک ساحلی به روش CFD (مطالعه موردی: عمارت دهدشتی بوشهر)، فضای زیست، 3 (2)، 113136. https://doi.org/10.22094/lsj.2024.1984002.1090.
حسنیلیچایی، ب.؛ حیدری، ش.؛ مفیدیشمیرانی، س. م. (1401)، بررسی آسایش حرارتی در فضاهای نیمهباز؛ مطالعه موردی خانههای بومی شهر رشت، معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، 10 (2)، 165184. https://doi.org/10.22061/jsaud.2022.8201.1935.
دهقان، ن.؛ اکرمی، ف.؛ ملکی، ع. (1401)، بررسی رفتار حرارتی ایوان در خانههای سنتی اصفهان با هدف بهینهسازی مصرف انرژی، اندیشه معماری، 6 (11)، 115135. https://doi.org/10.30479/at.2022.13511.1550.
رهایی، ا. (1400)، بررسی تأثیر تغییرات کالبدی حیاط مرکزی بر الگوی جریان هوا با روش CFD، معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، 9 (2)، 2546. https://doi.org/10.22061/jsaud.2021.6012.1597.
قهرمانایزدی، ن.؛ تقیپور، م.؛ اسکندری، ح.؛ موحد، خ. (1402)، تأثیر فرم و بازشوها در تهویه طبیعی خانههای حیاط مرکزی اقلیم گرم و مرطوب، معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، 11 (2)، 165181. https://doi.org/10.22061/jsaud.2023.9557.2124.
کریمزاده، ج.؛ مهدینژاد درزی، ج.ا.؛ کریمی، ب. (1401)، سنجش عملکرد ایوان در بهبود آسایش حرارتی خانههای تاریخی شیراز، مطالعات معماری ایران، 10 (20)، 89115. https://doi.org/10.22052/jias.2022.111875.
 
Aldawoud, A. J. (2008). Thermal performance analysis of courtyard buildings in hot climates. Energy and Buildings, 40 (10), 1928–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.07.007
ASHRAE Standard 55-2017: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy
Carlucci, S., Corgnati, S. P., & Pagliano, L. (2021). Extending the adaptive thermal comfort models for courtyards. Building and Environment, 197, 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107810
Chatzipoulka, C., Steemers, K., & Nikolopoulou, M. (2022). The role of outdoor courtyard design variables in microclimate performance. Building Simulation, 15 (2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0831-4
Crawley, D. B., Lawrie, L. K., Winkelmann, F. C., Buhl, W. F., Huang, Y. J., Pedersen, C. O., … Strand, R. K. (2001). EnergyPlus: Creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy and Buildings, 33 (4), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788 (00)00114-6
Diz-Mellado, E., López-Cabeza, A., & Jiménez, M. J. (2023). Unravelling the impact of courtyard geometry on cooling demand: A parametric simulation study. Energy and Buildings, 290, 113523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113523
Eskandari, H., Saedvandi, M., & Mahdavinejad, M. (2018). The impact of Iwan as a traditional shading device on the building energy consumption. Buildings, 8 (1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8010003
Fanger, P.O. Thermal Comfort: Analysis and Applications in Environmental Engineering. Danish Technical Press, 1970.
Foucquier, A., Robert, S., Suard, F., Stéphan, L., & Jay, A. (2013). State of the art in building modelling and energy performances prediction: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23, 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.004
Fumo, N. (2014). A review on the basics of building energy estimation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.040
Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Berardi, U., & Ghaffarianhoseini, A. (2015). Thermal performance characteristics of unshaded courtyards in hot and humid climates. Building and Environment, 87, 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2015.02.001
Hao, S., et al. (2019). The effects of courtyards on the thermal performance of a vernacular house in subtropical climate. Energies, 12 (6), 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061042
Hassan, A. M. S. (2024). Courtyard geometry’s effect on energy consumption of residential buildings in hot and dry climates. Scientific Reports, 14, 2567. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60487-8
López, L., Fernández, F., & Molina, J. (2018). Reviewing the thermal and microclimatic function of courtyards. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93, 580–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.055
Meir, I. A., Pearlmutter, D., & Etzion, Y. (1995). On the microclimatic behavior of two semi-enclosed attached courtyards in a hot dry region. Building and Environment, 30 (4), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323 (95)00018-2
Muhaisen, A. S. (2006). Shading simulation of the courtyard form in different climatic regions. Building and Environment, 41 (12), 1731–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.012
Muhaisen, A. S., & Gadi, M. B. (2006). Effect of courtyard proportions on solar heat gain and energy requirement in the temperate climate of Rome. Building and Environment, 41 (3), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.031
Nabil, A., & Mardaljevic, J. (2006). Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors. Lighting Research & Technology, 38 (1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782805li128oa
Ochoa, C. E., Aries, M. B. C., van Loenen, E. J., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2012). Considerations on design optimization criteria for windows providing low energy consumption and high visual comfort. Applied Energy, 95, 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.042
Reinhart, C. F., & Wienold, J. (2010). The Daylighting Dashboard — a simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces. Building and Environment, 46 (2), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.08.001
Sadafi, N., Salleh, E., Lim, C. H., & Jaafar, Z. (2011). Evaluating thermal effects of internal courtyard in a tropical terrace house by computational simulation. Energy and Buildings, 43 (4), 887–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.12.009
Safarzadeh, F., & Bahadori, M. N. (2005). Passive cooling in traditional Iranian architecture. Building and Environment, 40 (8), 955–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.04.014
Shaeri, J., Yaghoubi, M., & Habibi, A. (2018). Influence of Iwans on the thermal comfort of talar rooms in traditional houses: A study in Shiraz, Iran. Buildings, 8 (6), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8060081
Sharples, S., Yezioro, A., & Givoni, B. (2022). Shade and thermal comfort in courtyards: Experimental versus simulation study. Buildings, 12 (11), 1961. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111961
Shashua-Bar, L., & Hoffman, M. E. (2003). Geometry and orientation aspects in passive cooling of canyon streets with trees. Energy and Buildings, 35 (1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788 (02)00080-4
Soflaei, F., Shokouhian, M., & Mofidi Shemirani, S. M. (2016). Investigation of Iranian traditional courtyard as passive cooling strategy (a field study on BS climate). International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 5 (1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.12.001
Soflaei, F., Shokouhian, M., Tabadkani, A., Moslehi, H., & Berardi, U. (2020). A simulation-based model for courtyard housing design based on adaptive thermal comfort. Journal of Building Engineering, 31, 101335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101335
Sun, Q., Luo, Z., & Bai, L. (2023). The impact of internal courtyard configuration on thermal performance of long strip houses. Buildings, 13 (2), 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020371
Tabadkani, A., Aghasizadeh, S., Banihashemi, S., & Hajirasouli, A. (2022). Courtyard design impact on indoor thermal comfort and utility costs for residential households: Comparative analysis and deep-learning predictive model. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11 (5), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2022.02.006
Taleghani, M., Tenpierik, M., van den Dobbelsteen, A., & Sailor, D. J. (2014a). Heat in courtyards: A validated and calibrated parametric study of heat mitigation strategies for urban courtyards in the Netherlands. Solar Energy, 103, 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.01.033
Taleghani, M., Tenpierik, M. J., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2014b). Energy performance and thermal comfort of courtyard/atrium dwellings in the Netherlands in the light of climate change. Renewable Energy, 63, 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.028
Yaşa, E., & Ok, V. (2014). Evaluation of the effects of courtyard building shapes on solar heat gains and energy efficiency according to different climatic regions. Energy and Buildings, 73, 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.042
Zamani, Z., Heidari, S., & Hanachi, P. (2018). Reviewing the thermal and microclimatic function of courtyards. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 93, 580–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.055
Zhang, L., et al. (2017). The CTTC model for predicting courtyard air temperature in South China. Building Simulation, 10 (5), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0364-1
Zhu, L., Yang, J., & Wang, T. (2022). Study on strategy for optimization of thermal comfort of college courtyards. Atmosphere, 14 (11), 1685. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14111685
Zhou, X., Liu, R., Tian, S., Shen, X., Yang, X., An, J., & Yan, D. (2023). A review of validation methods for building energy modeling programs. Building Simulation, 16 (11), 2027–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-023-1050-0
Zuhaib, S., Hajdukiewicz, M., & Goggins, J. (2019). Application of a staged automated calibration methodology to a partially-retrofitted university building energy model. Journal of Building Engineering, 26, 100866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100866
دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 18
تابستان 1405
صفحه 127-141

  • تاریخ دریافت 05 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 05 تیر 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 06 تیر 1405