رهپویه معماری و شهرسازی

رهپویه معماری و شهرسازی

بازآفرینی خیابان شهری با رویکرد ارتقاء کیفیت و حضور‎پذیری شهروندان (نمونه موردی: خیابان ستارخان شیراز)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 کارشناس ارشد برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد یاسوج
2 دانشیار گروه شهرسازی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یاسوج، ایران
چکیده
فضاهای شهری، از جمله خیابان‎ها، از عناصر اساسی شکل‎دهنده حیات مدنی شهر به‎شمار می‎روند و نقشی فراتر از عملکرد صرفاً ارتباطی ایفا می‎کنند؛ به‎گونه‎ای که به بستری برای تعاملات اجتماعی، شکل‎گیری خاطرات جمعی و تجلی هویت شهری بدل می‎شوند. در این میان، خیابان ستارخان شیراز با توجه به موقعیت راهبردی خود و وجود کاربری‎های مهمی چون بیمارستان تخصصی، مراکز اداری، تجاری و فرهنگی، یکی از محورهای مهم و پرتردد شهری به شمار می‎آید. به عبارت دیگر این خیابان با موقعیت راهبردی و تراکم کاربری‎های متنوع، نقشی کلیدی در پویایی شهری ایفا می‎کند، اما با چالش‎هایی مانند کاهش کیفیت محیطی، ضعف در حضورپذیری کاربران، افزایش ترافیک، کمبود فضای سبز و کاهش امنیت مواجه است. این مشکلات ضرورت بازآفرینی این محور شهری با رویکردی انسان‎محور، مبتنی بر ارتقاء کیفیت محیط شهری و بهبود حضورپذیری شهروندان را نمایان می‎سازد. پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد کیفی و استفاده از روش نظریه زمینه‎ای، به بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر کیفیت و حضورپذیری خیابان ستارخان پرداخته است. داده‎ها از طریق مصاحبه‎های ساختار‎یافته با ۸۶ نفر از کاربران خیابان که بطور تصادفی انتخاب شده‎اند گردآوری شد تحلیل نشان می‎دهد که سه مؤلفه کلیدی – تحرک و جنب‎وجوش (به عنوان شاخص حضورپذیری)، جذابیت فضایی (برای بهبود کیفیت بصری)، و نوع و کیفیت فعالیت‎ها (فعال و غیرفعال) – بیشترین تأثیر را بر این مفاهیم دارند. نتایج این مطالعه می‎تواند راهنمای مؤثری برای سیاست‎گذاران و شهرسازان در بازآفرینی خیابان‎ها با تمرکز بر تجربه زیسته و تقویت حضور فعال شهروندان باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Urban Street Regeneration with an Emphasis on Enhancing Environmental Quality and Citizen Presence: A Case Study of Sattarkhan Street, Shiraz, Iran

نویسندگان English

Hamideh Zaeimi 1
Yaghoub Peyvastehgar 2
1 Master of Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Yasuj Branch
2 Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Islamic Azad University, Yasuj Branch, Iran
چکیده English

Urban public spaces, particularly streets, constitute one of the most significant components of the urban fabric and play a fundamental role in shaping social life, collective memory, and urban identity. Beyond their traditional transportation function, contemporary urban streets serve as multifunctional spaces that facilitate social interaction, economic activities, cultural exchange, and civic engagement. In recent decades, rapid urbanization, increasing motor vehicle dependency, and the prioritization of traffic-oriented planning approaches have significantly reduced the social and environmental quality of many urban streets. Consequently, the concept of urban street regeneration has emerged as a critical strategy for restoring the social, spatial, and environmental functions of streets while promoting human-centered urban development. Within this framework, enhancing environmental quality and increasing the presence and participation of citizens in urban spaces have become central objectives of sustainable urban planning and design.
Sattarkhan Street in Shiraz represents one of the city’s most important urban corridors due to its strategic location and concentration of diverse land uses. The street accommodates a wide range of functions, including specialized healthcare facilities, administrative offices, commercial centers, educational institutions, and cultural services. These characteristics have transformed Sattarkhan Street into a highly active and frequently used urban axis that attracts a substantial number of residents, employees, visitors, patients, and shoppers on a daily basis. Despite its strategic importance and functional diversity, the street faces several urban challenges that negatively affect its overall performance and user experience. Issues such as traffic congestion, insufficient pedestrian facilities, environmental degradation, visual disorder, inadequate green spaces, declining perceptions of safety, and limited opportunities for social interaction have gradually reduced the street’s attractiveness and its capacity to accommodate meaningful public life.
Given the growing importance of creating people-oriented urban environments, there is an urgent need to investigate the factors that influence environmental quality and citizen presence within this urban corridor. Regenerating Sattarkhan Street requires a comprehensive understanding of the physical, social, and functional dimensions that contribute to the vitality and livability of urban streets. Therefore, this study aims to identify and analyze the key factors affecting the quality and presence-friendliness of Sattarkhan Street and to provide practical insights for urban regeneration strategies that prioritize human experience and public engagement.
The research adopts a qualitative methodology grounded in the principles of Grounded Theory. This methodological approach was selected because it enables the systematic exploration of users’ perceptions, experiences, and interpretations of urban space while allowing theoretical concepts to emerge directly from empirical data. Data were collected through structured interviews conducted with eighty-six users of Sattarkhan Street. Participants were selected randomly from different age groups, genders, occupations, and user categories to ensure a diverse representation of street users and experiences. The interview process focused on understanding how individuals perceive the quality of the street environment, what factors encourage or discourage their presence, and how they evaluate the overall functionality and attractiveness of the space.
The collected data were analyzed through an iterative coding process involving open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. During the open coding phase, numerous concepts related to environmental quality, urban vitality, accessibility, safety, visual attractiveness, and social interaction were identified. In the axial coding stage, these concepts were categorized into broader thematic dimensions based on their relationships and interactions. Finally, selective coding facilitated the development of a conceptual framework that explains the factors influencing environmental quality and citizen presence in the study area.
The findings reveal that three primary dimensions play a decisive role in enhancing both the quality and presence-friendliness of Sattarkhan Street. The first dimension is urban vitality and dynamism, which emerged as the most significant indicator of citizen presence. Respondents consistently emphasized the importance of active public spaces, continuous pedestrian movement, diverse user groups, and opportunities for social interaction in creating an attractive and lively street environment. Urban vitality was found to be strongly associated with feelings of safety, comfort, and belonging. Streets characterized by active human presence are perceived as safer and more welcoming, thereby encouraging longer stays and repeated visits.
The second dimension identified in the study is spatial attractiveness and visual quality. Participants highlighted the importance of aesthetic elements such as street landscaping, urban furniture, greenery, façade quality, cleanliness, lighting, and visual coherence. The findings indicate that visually appealing environments significantly enhance users’ emotional attachment to place and positively influence their willingness to spend time in public spaces. Conversely, visual pollution, neglected urban elements, and poor maintenance were identified as factors that diminish the perceived quality of the street environment and reduce citizen engagement.
The third dimension relates to the type and quality of activities, including both active and passive uses of urban space. Active activities encompass commercial interactions, cultural events, recreational opportunities, and community gatherings, while passive activities include walking, observing urban life, resting, and casual social encounters. The results demonstrate that the diversity and quality of activities available along the street directly influence patterns of use and levels of public participation. Streets that offer a broader range of opportunities for engagement are more likely to attract diverse user groups and sustain activity throughout different times of the day.
The interaction between these three dimensions generates a synergistic effect that contributes to the overall success of urban streets as public places. The findings suggest that environmental quality and citizen presence are not independent phenomena but rather interconnected aspects of urban experience. Improvements in visual quality, for example, can strengthen urban vitality by attracting more users, while increased activity levels can enhance perceptions of safety and comfort. Similarly, the provision of diverse activities can stimulate social interaction and foster a stronger sense of place attachment among residents and visitors.
From a planning and policy perspective, the study underscores the necessity of shifting from vehicle-oriented approaches toward more human-centered urban regeneration strategies. Enhancing walkability, improving pedestrian infrastructure, increasing green spaces, upgrading public amenities, strengthening street identity, and supporting mixed-use development are among the key interventions recommended for improving the quality and functionality of Sattarkhan Street. Such measures can contribute to creating a more inclusive, vibrant, and resilient urban environment that better responds to the needs and expectations of contemporary urban residents.
The research contributes to the growing body of literature on urban street regeneration by emphasizing the central role of citizen experience in evaluating and transforming public spaces. Unlike conventional approaches that focus primarily on physical infrastructure, this study highlights the importance of integrating social, perceptual, and behavioral dimensions into urban planning processes. The findings demonstrate that successful street regeneration depends not only on physical improvements but also on fostering environments that encourage active public life, social interaction, and meaningful engagement with urban space.
In conclusion, the regeneration of Sattarkhan Street should be approached as a multidimensional process that simultaneously addresses environmental quality, urban vitality, and activity diversity. By prioritizing these interconnected factors, urban planners and policymakers can enhance the street’s capacity to function as a dynamic public realm that supports social cohesion, economic activity, and urban sustainability. The results of this study provide valuable guidance for future urban regeneration projects in Shiraz and other cities facing similar challenges, offering a practical framework for designing streets that are not only efficient transportation corridors but also vibrant places for everyday urban life.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Revitalization
urban street revitalization
citizen accessibility. Satar Khan Street
Shiraz
ایران‎مهر، مسلم؛ گیتی‎پسند، زهرا (۱۳۹۵)، یک پژوهش کیفی: بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر خوش بینی دانش آموزان به نظام آموزشی، فرهنگ مشاوره و روان درمانی، 7 (27).
پاکزاد، جهانشاه (۱۳۸۵)، راهنمای طراحی فضاهای شهری در ایران، تهران: انتشارات شهیدی: وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی و معماری.
پاکزاد، جهانشاه (۱۳۸۴)، راهنمای طراحی فضاهای شهری در ایران، شرکت طرح و نشر پیام سیما، وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی، تهران.
تیبالدز، فرانسیس (۱۳۸۳)، شهرسازی شهروندگرا ارتقا عرصه‎های همگانی در محیط‎های شهری، ترجمۀ محمد احمدی نژاد، اصفهان: نشر خاک.
توکلی ثانی، مهدیه السادات؛ عربی، زهرا (۱۳۹۵)، بررسی تأثیر کیفیت‎های زیباشناختی بر انواع حضورپذیری افراد در فضای شهری، کنگره بین‎المللی معماری و شهرسازی معاصر جهان.
حمزه‎نژاد، مهدی؛ قلیچی، پدرام (۱۳۹۷)، بررسی اجتماع‎پذیری و کیفیت قرارگاه‎های رفتاری در پارک‎های درون دانشگاهی؛ مورد مطالعاتی: پارک دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، معماری و شهرسازی آرمانشهر، ش 25، 55-45.
حمزه‎نژاد، مهدی؛ شریفبان، زهرا (۱۳۹۵)، ارزیابی تطبیقی معیارهای سنتی و جدید اجتماع‎پذیر و تحقق آن در دو محله سنتی و جدید؛ مطالعه موردی: محله جلفا، سپاهان‎شهر اصفهان، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی شهر ایرانی، ش 26، 88-71.
دانش‎پور، سیدعبدالهادی؛ چرخیان، مریم، فضاهای عمومی و عوامل مؤثر بر حیات جمعی، باغ نظر، ش 7، 28-19.
روشن‎دل، تکتم؛ سلطانی‎فرد، هادی؛ عباس‎زاده، شهاب؛ سلطانی‎مقدم، محمد (۱۳۹۵)، واکاوی ابعاد کیفیت محیطی تأثیرگذار بر حضورپذیری فضاهای تجاری (نمونه موردی: خیابان تجاری راهنمایی مشهد)، مطالعات و پژوهش‎های منطقه‎ای، سال هشتم، ش 28، 92-71.
رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ خدائی، زهرا (۱۳۸۸)، بررسی شاخص‎ها و معیارهای مؤثر بر رضایتمندی شهروندان از فضاهای عمومی شهری، نشریه راهبرد، دوره 18، ش 53، 248-227.
شعبانی باغانی، محمد جواد (۱۳۹۹)، تدوین الگوهای ارتقا کیفی خیابان شهری با رویکرد زیست‎پذیری (نمونه موردی : خیابان شریعتی تهران حدفاصل میرداماد تا ظفر)، پایان نامه تحصیلی جهت اخذ درجه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس شهید رجائی، دانشکده مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، استاد راهنما: عبدالحمید قنبران.
طهماسبی، فرخ؛ نظم‎فر، حسین؛ قنبری، ابوالفضل؛ رضایی‎نیا، حسن (۱۴۰۱)، اجتماع‎پذیری و سرزندگی فضاهای عمومی شهری: شواهدی از دیدگاه متخصصین و کاربران در خیابان ولیعصر تهران، دانش شهرسازی، 6 (2)، 131-148.
غفوری، فواد؛ قلندریان، ایمان (۱۴۰۲)، بازآفرینی خیابان چهارباغ هرات با هدف ارتقاء هویت مکان، باغ نظر، 20 (123)، 45-65.
گلکار، کورش (۱۳۷۹)، مؤلفه‎های سازنده کیفیت طراحی شهری، نشریه صفه، شماره 32، 65-38.
معرب، یاسر؛ گلچین، پیمان؛ امیری، محمد جواد؛ افسری، رسول (۱۳۹۴)، بررسی مقایس‎های کیفیت خیابان‎های شهری تهران بر اساس معیارهای خیابان ممتاز (مطالعه موردی: خیابان‎های انقلاب، کشاورز و فاطمی)، مجله محیط‎شناسی، ش 1، 296-283.
فروشی، نرگس؛ مهری، طیبه؛ وثیق، بهزاد (۱۳۹۲)، مبانی معماری تعامل‎گرا و انسان محور در طراحی فضاهای عمومی، کنفرانس ملی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد قزوین.
طاهری سرمد، فائزه (۱۴۰۲)، تحلیل کیفیت فضایی محیط پیاده‎روهای خیابان تجاری با تأکید بر نیازهای راحتی زنان (نمونه موردی: خیابان مصدق و نوبهار شهر کرمانشاه)، عنوان نشریه، ۲۲ (۷۰)، ۱۱۱-۱۲۹، http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article۱-۳۳۶۱-fa.html
راهنمای تهیه طرح‎های بازآفرینی شهری (۱۴۰۰)، شرکت مادر تخصصی عمران و بهسازی شهری ایران.
 رفاه اجتماعی (1385)، کیفیت زندگی شهری در ایران، فصلنامه رفاه اجتماعی، 20 (1)، 23-40.
مازندرانی، ن. (۱۴۰۰)، شناخت ابعاد ترجیحات محیطی شهروندان در ارتباط با کیفیت حضورپذیری خیابان‎های شهری، کنفرانس بین‎المللی پژوهش‎های نوین در شهرسازی، تهران.
حبیب‎زاده کوزه کنانی، س. ج.؛ عبداله‎زاده طرف، ا. (۱۳۹۵)، طراحی شهری خیابان در جهت ارتقاء حس مکان؛ مطالعه موردی: خیابان گلشن راز شبستر، پژوهش و برنامه‎ریزی شهری، 7 (25)، 105-124.
Becchi, A., Buffoli, M., Dettori, M., Appolloni, L., Azara, A., Castiglia, P., D’Alessandro, D., & Capolongo, S. (2019). Walkable environments and healthy urban moves: Urban context features assessment framework experienced in Milan. Sustainability, 11 (10), 2778. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102778
Carmona, M., T., Tiesdell, S. & Oc, T. (2004). Public Places Urban Spaces. Routledge: Abington, UK.
Chen, F., & Chen, Y. (2022). Urban metabolism and spontaneous architectural growth: A sustainable strategy featuring participatory co-construction by multiple stakeholders. Buildings, 12 (3), 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030352
Della Spina, L. (2019). Multidimensional assessment for “culture-led” and “community-driven” urban regeneration as driver for trigger economic vitality in urban historic centers. Sustainability, 11 (24), 7237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247237
Kashef ,Mohamad. (2016). Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Frontiers ofArchitecturalResearch 5.
Mehta V. (2013). The street: A quintessential social public space. New York: Routledge.
Nia, H. A., & Suleiman, Y. H. (2018). Aesthetics of space organization: Lessons from traditional European cities. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 2 (1), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2018.3659
Rahbarianyazd, R. (2017). Sustainability in historic urban environments: Effect of gentrification in the process of sustainable urban revitalization. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 1 (1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.25034/1761.1 (1)1-9
Roberts, P. 2000. The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration, in P. Roberts and H. Syke)eds Urban Regeneration, A Handbook. British Urban Regeneration Association, SAGE Publications,London9–36.
Schönfeld, K. C. & Bertolini, L. (2017). Urban streets: Epitomes of planning challenges and opportunities at the interface of public space and mobility. Cities, 68, 48-55.
Sheikh-Mohammad-Zadeh, A., Saunier, N., & Waygood, E. O. D. (2022). Developing an objective framework to evaluate street functions. Sustainability, 14 (12), 7184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127184
Wang, M., & Yang, J. (2022). Sustainable renewal of historical urban areas: A demand–potential–constraint model for identifying the renewal type of residential buildings. Buildings, 12 (8), 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081210
Ye, Y., Li, D., & Liu, X. (2018). How block density and typology affect urban vitality: An exploratory analysis in Shenzhen, China. Urban Geography, 39 (4), 631-652. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1381536
Zhang, J., Ma, Z., Li, D., Liu, W., Tong, Y., & Li, C. (2020). Young pioneers, vitality, and commercial gentrification in Mudan Street, Changchun, China. Sustainability, 12 (8), 3113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083113
Zumelzu, A., Estrada, M., Moya, M., & Troppa, J. (2022). Experiencing public spaces in southern Chile: Analysing the effects of the built environment on walking perceptions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (19), 12577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912577.
Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015). Towards a new epistemology of the urban. City, 19 (2), 151-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
UN Habitat. (2020). World Cities Report 2020: The Value of Sustainable Urbanization. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report-2020-the-value-of-sustainable-urbanization.
Işıklar Bengi, S. (2017). Vitality of the cities. International Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 4 (1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2017.04.3
Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3 (1), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418
Ye, Y., Zhang, X., & Van Nes, A. (2021). Measuring urban vitality and its determinants in high-density cities: A case study of Nanjing, China. Sustainability, 13 (6), 3310. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368845326_A_Review_of_Urban_Vitality_Research_in_the_Chinese_World
Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Project for Public Spaces.
Ewing, R., & Clemente, O. (2013). Measuring urban design: Metrics for livable places. Island Press.
Van den Bosch, M., & Sang, Å. O. (2017). Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health–A systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research, 158, 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040
Cura, R., Perret, J., & Paparoditis, N. (2018). A state of the art of urban reconstruction: Street, street network, vegetation, urban feature. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.04332
Velkavrh, L., Lipar, P. (Mentor), & Rijavec, R. (Comentor). (2016). Projektiranje mestnih prometnih površin po smernicah NACTO (National Association of City Transport Officials). [Publication information, if available].
Jafari, F., Rostaei, S., & Karimi, A. (2018). An analysis of the theoretical foundations of urban regeneration and the presentation of an optimal model. Journal of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Tabriz. Retrieved from https://urplanning.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_18818.html.
Gholami, Y., & Dolatiarian, K. (2018). A conceptual analysis of urban regeneration and its role in the revitalization of urban fabrics. Second National Conference on Urban Revitalization Experiences in Iran (Emphasizing the Green Experience).  https://civilica.com/doc/870764/
Sadik-Khan, J., & Solomonow, S. (2016). Streetfight: Handbook for an urban revolution. Penguin.
Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.
Carmona, M. (2019). Place value: Place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes. Journal of Urban Design, 24 (1), 1-48.
Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2008). Making cycling irresistible: Lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28 (4), 495-528.
Gehl, J. (2013). How to study public life. Island Press.
Dovey, K. (2016). Urban design thinking: A conceptual toolkit. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Forsyth, A. (2015). What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. Urban Design International, 20 (4), 274-292.
Biddulph, M. (2012). Introduction to residential layout. Routledge.
Forsyth, A. (2015). What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. Urban Design International, 20 (4), 274-292.
Sadik-Khan, J., & Solomonow, S. (2016). Streetfight: Handbook for an urban revolution. Penguin.
Dovey, K. (2016). Urban design thinking: A conceptual toolkit. Bloomsbury Publishing.
de Las Rivas Sanz, J. L. (2013). Urban regeneration and its role in city planning: Perspectives from Spain. In International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Science (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324115697.
De Magalhaes, C. (2015). Urban regeneration. In International Encyclopedia of Social & Behavioral Science (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.74031-1.
Akbari, A., & Tahmasebi, S. (2020). Walkability and Social Presence in Urban Public Spaces. Iranian Journal of Urban Studies, 6 (2), 145–167.
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2004). Public Places − Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Routledge.
Cheng Liang, C., (2022). Street Renewal and Urban Livability: Case Study in Nanjing. Urban Design Review, 12 (3), 210-223.
De Magalhaes, C. (2015). Urban Regeneration and the New Community Paradigm. Cities, 44, 131–136.
Gibson, V., & Kocabas, A. (2001). Integrated Urban Regeneration: Towards Sustainable Development. Urban Studies, 38 (10), 1785–1796.
Hudson, R. (2001). Regional Development and the Social Economy. Regional Studies, 35, 123-133.
Kapplan, S., & Six, M. (2007). Environmental Preference Model and Urban Quality. Journal of Urban Environments, 21 (4), 567-590.
Noon, M., Blyton, P., & Morrell, K. (2000). Participation in Urban Regeneration. Urban Studies, 37, 1107–1121.
Roberts, P. (2000). Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. SAGE Publications.
Saunier, S., Rebecchi, A., & Zumelzu, A. (2022). Environmental Qualities of Urban Streets and Presence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 217, 104307.
Zumelzu, A., Rebecchi, A. (2022). Quality of Urban Street Life and Walkability. Cities, 123, 103578.
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2004). Public Places − Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Routledge.
Jacobs, A., & Appleyard, D. (1987). Toward an Urban Design Manifesto. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53 (1), 112–120.
Lynch, K. (1981). The Theory of Good City Form. MIT Press.
Saunier, S., Rebecchi, A., & Zumelzu, A. (2022). Environmental Qualities of Urban Streets and Presence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 217, 104307.
Bentley, I. (1985). Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers. Routledge.
Goodey, B. (1993). Urban Design: Street and Square. Butterworth Architecture.
Hudson, R. (2001). Regional Development and the Social Economy. Regional Studies, 35, 123-133.
Noon, M., Blyton, P., & Morrell, K. (2000). Participation in Urban Regeneration. Urban Studies, 37, 1107–1121.
Roberts, P. (2000). Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. SAGE Publications.
Zhang, Y., Li, X., & Chen, L. (2020). Urban Regeneration and Spatial Justice. Cities, 102, 102735.
Chen, H., et al. (2022). Integrative Approaches to Street Regeneration: Insights from China. Journal of Urban Planning, 9 (2), 154–170.
Shaw, K., & Robinson, F. (1998). Learning from experience? Reflections on urban regeneration in the UK. European Planning Studies, 6 (1), 21–35.
Ewing, R., & Clemente, O. (2013). Measuring Urban Design: Metrics for Livable Places. Island Press.
Xing, Z., & Guo, W. (2022). A new urban space analysis method based on space syntax and geographic information system using multisource data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11 (5), 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11050297.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications.
www.amar.org.ir
www.sarjoo.ir

  • تاریخ دریافت 13 آذر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 12 تیر 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 13 تیر 1405